Currently I pretend to be working on a book called, Seminarians Don't Blow Stuff Up. It will be a hilarious adventure of the life of a seminarian, but more importantly a comedic way to ask the question, "What does it mean to be holy?"
Major Publications:
27 Million Revolutions for 27 Million Slaves (2013). A book specifically about my two-month bicycle journey across the United States, approximately 2,700 miles, in an effort to raise awareness and funds for the fight against human trafficking/modern slavery. In the book you can learn how and why slavery is now worse than ever. You can also learn what you can do to end slavery today. What's unique about this book is that it is not just about slavery, not just about the facts and emotions of it; 27 Million Revolutions is also about how we can change our attitudes and lifestyles to live a better life, be better citizens of our community and the world, and how to be more hospitable to all those around us.
Buy 27 Million Revolutions for 27 Million Slaves here. You can also buy it as a Kindle edition or on other e-book formats. You can also follow the blog at http://27millionrevolutions.blogspot.com/.
Created Human Divinity: A Theology of Empowerment Developed Through Dialogue (Westbow Press; a division of Thomas Nelson Publishing, 2014). A fairly easy to follow theological treatise that revolutionizes how we think about the human-God relationship. It is a new, provocative theology that is easier for people to swallow than much of traditional Christianity without a reduction of what faith means: we are divine and we have power in this world. Your relationship with God literally empowers you to, in the words of Flyleaf, "Rise and be all that you dreamed." Created Human Divinity also changes the nature of Christianity's relationship with modern philosophy, making it accessible to agnostics and atheists.
Here's what Dr. R. Kendall Soulen has to say about Created Human Divinity: "Few distinctions are more fundamental to classical Christian theology than that between God and creation. In this remarkable book John Lucy challenges this fundamental distinction, proposing that Christians should reckon instead with the category of created human divinity. Lucy is to be commended for the remarkable range of theologians he engages, and for making his case with boldness and clarity. Good scholarship makes us think, and Created Human Divinity does just that." High praise from a respected scholar.
Buy Created Human Divinity: A Theology of Empowerment Developed Through Dialogue here. You can also purchase the book on Kindle or on other e-book formats.
______________________________________________________________________________
Other Samples:
"Eating Pie" as published in Onion River Review, Spring 2008, may be my best poem. Here's another sample, originally published in Wesley Journal. Following that is an essay still on the road to publication but that I think important for people to read. Entitled "I Am A Communist," it was originally written in response to the shootings in Norway, Colorado, and Wisconsin that all happened in quick succession.
“September’s Reign”
With good reason the winged migrants of flight flee
once dark September lengthens our shadows;
the month whose air cools
and roars a heavy breeze pleading for aid
at winter's gates to come--come conquer us all.
Light leaves fall, true enough, but what shelter
does a fading rainbow build
once dark September lengthens our shadows;
the month whose air cools
and roars a heavy breeze pleading for aid
at winter's gates to come--come conquer us all.
Light leaves fall, true enough, but what shelter
does a fading rainbow build
descending from homes of crows?
When September ends, soon enough
even the Sun will howl
tortured on the back of a mocking wind,
begging for a close to the cold torch's reign,
that reversal of God's created order, the shining sign of life
fallen victim to the black void,
the void from before all beginnings, now
we see only the chaos waters doom
When September ends, soon enough
even the Sun will howl
tortured on the back of a mocking wind,
begging for a close to the cold torch's reign,
that reversal of God's created order, the shining sign of life
fallen victim to the black void,
the void from before all beginnings, now
we see only the chaos waters doom
caged trouts under its glass ceiling frozen still
stiff stout with a slippery shield.
For every year to haunt and hunt
For every year to haunt and hunt
what king must have ascended
when Adam dropped to his knees
with the arrow of bland death perched at the ready
waiting to strike
when light shrinks from sight, clouded
by grey formless storms sapping
our warmed walls, because ice shatters all
when Adam dropped to his knees
with the arrow of bland death perched at the ready
waiting to strike
when light shrinks from sight, clouded
by grey formless storms sapping
our warmed walls, because ice shatters all
whose misplaced courage stands in snowy depths
September, the messenger of yearly tyranny
soon to come, no slower than the twang of the bow
shot from the dark king moon
September, the messenger of yearly tyranny
soon to come, no slower than the twang of the bow
shot from the dark king moon
at its rival carrying Adam in wrinkled arms.
___________________________________________________________________________
"I Am A Communist"
___________________________________________________________________________
"I Am A Communist"
I am not a Communist. I just wanted to get your
attention. I am, however, an anarchist. Neither Communism nor anarchy are
particularly favored here in the west, and for that reason I hope to have
doubly garnered your attention. Yet the reason why I am an anarchist and can
say that I agree with Marx’s ideas – freeing every individual to do what they
please, within reason – though I do not appreciate the collective aspect – is
quite compatible with American democracy and ideals, and why I am writing this
essay, because I believe we do not give enough thought to the implication of those
ideals.[1]
Let me begin by telling a few brief stories, at least two
of which may convince you that I’m a terrible person.
. . . . . . . . . . .
In ninth grade I had an English teacher named Mr. Lewis.
At least I think that’s his name. Mr. Lewis was clearly a little strange: he
had a long ponytail of graying hair, weirdly large eyes, rarely did he button
his cuffs so his shirt sleeves were always flailing about, and he never quite
looked clean. All the same I liked Mr. Lewis. He was funny, gentle, but never
took any crap, and if I paid more attention in my early years I could have
learned a lot from him. As it is, Common Errors (grammar) A-F will never leave
me.
One day Mr. Lewis was teaching on a book that I didn’t
like nor do I remember. All that stands out to me in my memory (and I’m pretty
sure this is all that I could remember of the book even while reading it) is a
character named Phineas and someone falling down stairs. The book isn’t the
point. The point is that while talking about something or other that might be
helpful for me to know in telling this story, a student raised hand and said
“Who cares about this? Some people think stupid stuff, I shouldn’t have to try
and understand them or respect them.“
The “who cares” is a typical 9th grade sentiment, but
apparently Mr. Lewis was bothered by the whole argument. It seemed random to me
at the time, probably because of my reaction, but Mr. Lewis responded, “I am a
Communist. Does that matter? Does that make me less of a person?” Yes, yes it does, I thought. I had yet
to learn what communism meant, being too young to recall the shake-ups of 1991,
and not caring much about the news, but somehow I knew that Communists were
either silly and stupid or “just plain bad,” in my ninth grade lingo. I was
appalled. Never did I respect Mr. Lewis again, though he still made me laugh
and was still in control of my grades. For the final couple of months with him
as my teacher, I simply could not get it out of my head that I was subjugated
to learning from a stinking Communist.
. . . . . . . . . . .
Looking back on my life, I am not certain when I became
friends with Mike Rodriguez. I know that we first met in middle school when we
were at some camp together or somewhere that my friends and I were playing
volleyball. Mike and his friends walked to the volleyball court to play against
us. I later came to be friends with everyone on the sand that day, but at the
time I had no idea who any of these people were, which only made their rudeness
worse. Unfortunately, they were most rude to Mike, making him the butt of jokes
and often saying, “Don’t pull a Mike.” At some point Mike switched to our team
but his friends treatment of him only worsened. Without even knowing who Mike
was, I felt that I should protect him somehow. We haven’t talked in a long time
but I know that Mike would hate me if he ever heard that I felt the need to
protect him. That feeling, though, motivated me to play better for and with
him. Mike and I had fun, I think, developing some volleyball chemistry together
and, though I can’t remember who won, I know he and I and my friends then
played well enough to give Mike some bragging rights.
Within a few years Mike and I were good friends. I’m not
sure what made us friends, but I’ll venture to guess it was that we both felt
respected by the other without effort (and for a while the girl we both like
played us off one another). What’s funny and horrible about the friendship that
we had is that, as soon as we became friends, he became the butt of my jokes.
What’s funny about that is I was not, until then, the type of person to make
fun of others – unless I hated them, in which case they weren’t my friends.
Why did I start making fun of Mike who, in a number of
ways, was my truest friend? In Spanish class one day, our teacher, who was and
is hilarious and friendly, said to Mike genially that he saw Mike and his
mother exiting the Jewish temple after a service. I looked at Mike and couldn’t
believe it: a real Jew! Our teacher asked how often Mike went to temple and
Mike said rarely, clearly flustered and frustrated with the questions. Being
the nice guy that he is our teacher took the hint and stopped asking questions
– he often wanted his students to know that he was interested in their lives,
but Mike was not interested. Clearly Mike was not much into practicing Judaism,
though I hate that phrase taken from Catholics being applied to Catholics or
Jews, but from then on I had a reason to make fun of Mike: he was a Jew for
goodness sakes.
I don’t think that I had yet
taken the world religion class, or world history class or whatever it was
called, but even if I had, as I said before, I didn’t pay much attention in my
early years. Either way, all I knew at that time and until college was that
Jews believe in God but not Christ. That didn’t seem reason enough to make fun
of Mike. And my parents did the best they could raising me to be understanding,
tolerant, and loving rather than a judgmental bigot of any kind. In fact, I
don’t think I ever thought about Mike’s being Jewish or what that meant; nor
did I realize that I had made fun of him for being Jewish until after I had
done so a few times. I simply instinctively knew, somehow from somewhere, that
being Jewish was funny. So obviously I should make fun of Mike for it. People
often say that we are afraid of what and who is different, and that may have
been part of it, but my reaction and action toward Mike’s being a Jew was
deeper than simply knowing him to be different. Where I got it from I will
never know.
. . . . . . . . . . .
Where I went to college there is
a gas station and convenience store right next door to the dorms. I have always
been an early bird - early to bed and
early-ish to rise – but occasionally I found myself up late, meaning after
11p.m. Whenever this happened I’d be hungry, because my eating schedule didn’t
plan on it. One evening, then, as I sat around being hungry, I decided to take
a walk over to the gas station to buy some goodies. About to stand behind the
man checking out at the register ahead of me, I noted a beat-up old car pulling
into one of the parking spots in front of the station.
Perhaps because I went to school
in northern Vermont where such a sight is rare, but I was shocked to see a
young black male step out of the car. Shortly after registering my shock, I observed
that the young man wore a bandana and jeans falling down over his boxers. Rough-looking
car, bandana, falling jeans, late at night, and worst of all, black male –
instinctively I stepped back with the intention of circling around the store
and then leaving hurriedly without purchasing my food. Just a couple of steps
into my brilliant survival plan I realized I was being stupid. I mean, I had
clearly been in line, and if I were to bolt, no matter how subtly, he’d know
that I was running away and shoot me.
Best if I don’t spark his ire, I thought,
and if he already plans to shoot the place up I’m a dead man anyway. I braced
myself for death.
It wasn’t until returning to my
room and chowing down that I acknowledged how much of a racist I had just been.
I wasn’t a racist and never have been, so I have ever since been ashamed of
malforming a harmless young man into Satan himself.
. . . . . . . . . . .
The latter story has often
occupied my thoughts because, living in the Northeast, going to school in the
Northeast, and then attending seminary in Washington, D.C., I have often heard
“How can anyone be a racist?” While at seminary preparing for a trip to South
Africa with some colleagues, a professor asked us to go around telling a story
or two of how and when we’ve encountered racism in our lives. I told my story
of the young man. To a person, though, everyone else told a story of seeing
racism in and perpetrated by others that my colleagues then had to handle. For
the African American students in the room that makes sense and I’m grateful
beyond words for it, but I was astounded to be surrounded by twenty of the
holiest and most innocent people on the planet.
Here’s the deal, folks: we spend
way too much time and effort projecting the evil of the world onto others. In
reality, we are a) not that much different than “those others” that we
criticize and object to; b) part of the problem. Instead of asking, “How can
anyone be racist/sexist?” or “How can anyone be so full of hate and ignorance
that they’d shoot up a Sikh temple or a Muslim kids camp or a school or a
Batman movie theater?” or “How could Joe Paterno and Penn State not have done
anything?” we should be asking ourselves what parts of our nature and character
must share in our disappointment in, and perhaps condemnation of, others and
their actions. In so doing we will see that we do, in fact, harbor attitudes
that contribute to many of the problems we see in the world around us. May the
trials and inquiries occur as they will, but as a people seeking a better way
forward, reflection and confession should be our preferred response.
The truth is, after all, as I
hope my stories have shown, many of our instincts and thoughts are inherited
from who knows where. Apparently, rather than developing a society where each
individual has a right to free expression and thought, we live in a collective,
albeit a disguised and faint one. Particularly as a Christian, I am not
strictly opposed to collective thinking. But I am only not opposed when the
prospective individuals were free beforehand.
If we do not want our society,
churches, and culture infiltrated or ruled by what we deem perverse thought,
then we as individuals must root those thoughts out of ourselves. We must
constantly evaluate, reevaluate, reflect and confess because we may possess
ideas and instincts not our own imbibed in us by some unknown and unapproved
collective – yikes! We must be extremely careful with the jokes that we tell and
why, what judgments we are making and why, what our instinctive reactions are
and why, etc. By evaluating, reflecting and confessing, we will and must assert
our own individuality and personhood.
I don’t intend for this essay to
be merely about individuality. My focus on individuality and individual
personhood is simply an attempt to make sense of the contrast between our
holding many noble principles and beliefs yet never noticing that somehow or
another we have been taught, and trained, to act and judge contradictorily to
those principles and beliefs, or at least to contribute to contradictory
attitudes in unseen ways. By changing our focus from others and blaming and
questioning and reproaching, to ourselves in the deepest and most painful forms
of reflection confession, I hope that we all can learn how to live better and
better moment by moment rather than merely talking a good game. Hopefully, too,
we can then embody what it means to live a good life for others to see rather
than only offering the model of blame and reproach, which can only lead to
varying degrees of fear and hate. Asserting our own individuality and
personhood, rather than accepting whatever thoughts we seem to have learned,
through evaluation, reflection, and confession will win the day.
[1]
Marx writes in The German Ideology,
“The reality, which communism is creating, is precisely the real basis for
rendering it impossible that anything should exist independently of
individuals, in so far as things are only a product of the preceding
intercourse of individuals themselves.”
Elsewhere Marx comments that the purpose of communism is to allow
individuals to be, basically, whatever they want to be at any given moment
without economic or financial constrictions (since the State will
provide). Individuals living full and
fully free lives is one of, if not the major, goals of Marxist thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment